Scientific & Technical Editing (STEM)
Clearer writing. Stronger structure. Fewer reviewer comments—without changing your science.
Scientific & technical editing focuses on clarity, structure, and readability for STEM audiences—while keeping your meaning intact.
What I can help with
Manuscripts (journal submissions, revisions, resubmissions)
Theses/dissertations (including committee-ready polish)
Grants, reports, and technical documents
Course materials (STEM-heavy content, lab manuals, lesson text)
Figures/tables text: captions, callouts, consistency, labeling
What you’ll get
Clearer sentences and smoother flow (without losing precision)
Stronger organization (headings, logical order, transitions)
Grammar/usage consistency + terminology consistency
A polished, professional tone appropriate to your audience
Comments where clarification is needed (not guessing at meaning)
Project Packages
(Final price depends on length, complexity, and turnaround. I’ll confirm scope after your intake.)
Essential Polish
Best for: documents that are mostly solid but need cleanup
Clarity + grammar + consistency pass
Light structure suggestions
One round of edits
Submission-Ready (most popular)
Best for: journal submissions and committee-ready drafts
Clarity + grammar + consistency
Structure + flow improvements
Commented questions where needed
One revision pass after you address comments (light)
Deep Revision Support
Best for: messy drafts, multi-author documents, or major rework
Heavier restructuring + rewrite suggestions where appropriate
Section-level organization help
Priority turnaround options
One to two revision passes (as quoted)
How it works
Start Here → share your document, goals, and deadline
I reply with a scope + fixed project quote + timeline
You receive a marked-up file + clean version, and next-step notes
FAQ
Will you rewrite my content?
I’ll improve clarity and flow. Heavy rewriting is available as a quoted add-on.
Do you fact-check the science?
I focus on writing quality and structure. I’ll flag unclear/unsupported statements but won’t act as an external peer reviewer.
What file types do you accept?
Word or Google Docs are easiest. PDFs are workable for light edits, but not ideal for deep revision.
Turnaround time?
Depends on length and schedule—rush options available when possible.
